Notice: get_the_author_ID is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use get_the_author_meta('ID') instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

Notice: attribute_escape is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use esc_attr() instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

Notice: attribute_escape is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use esc_attr() instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

Architectural Ornament in Heraldry and Emblems

Notice: get_the_author_ID is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use get_the_author_meta('ID') instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

Notice: attribute_escape is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use esc_attr() instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

Notice: attribute_escape is deprecated since version 2.8.0! Use esc_attr() instead. in /home/designby/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3888

When we look at architectural ornament in the categories of heraldry and emblems, we  find  abstract compositions that no longer imply a physical connection, as was the case with human, animal, and bird forms. Instead, we see a miscellany of items: plums, crowns, flowers, shields, weapons, and other things associated with aristocracy.  Such things make up the vocabulary of heraldry, which  was systematically established throughout Europe in the twelfth century to meet the demand for emblems of respectability and  proclaim the importance of feudal families. Tracing family genealogies  and devising coats of arms were its principle tasks.

Over time the aristocracy of business and commerce subsumed that of humans. Companies and corporations commissioned heraldic crests emblazoned on shields, which were displayed on the buildings they owned and occupied.

Although company logos have now replaced heraldic crests, we can still find examples of the old-fasioned heraldry on pre-modern buildings. The  terra cotta plaque shown below, which appears on a building at 101 The Embarcadero, is an example of such heraldry. The client is not identified, but the decorative elements imply prestige, even royalty, as in the fleur-de-lis, the royal lilly of France.

101 The Embarcadero, San Francisco.

Below, the “M” for Matson, an internationally known shipping line, is rendered in rope. The facade of the company building at 216 Market Street building is embellished with nautical symbols such as anchors, dolphins, and shells. Portraits of the Matson steamships appear in cartouches.

216 Market Street, San Francisco.

The bronze plaque on the building at 233 Sansome Street is an heraldic tribute to the firemen who may have occupied the building.

233 Sansome Street, San Francisco.

The former Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company building of 1925, designed by Timothy Pflueger, has a  bell framed in a rondel suspended above staff-like elements often used in heraldry as symbols of authority.

134-140 New Montgomery St, San Francisco.

The bell was modeled by the sculptor Pio Oscar Tognelli who was employed by the Gladding McBean terra cotta manufacturing company in Lincoln, California. This factory produced terra cotta ornament for buildings, particularly on the west coast,  from the late 19th through the first decades of the 20th century. The Gladding McBean company’s history traces the growing popularity of terra cotta.

The factory’s location in the small city of Lincoln followed the discovery nearby of an extensive deposit of pure white kaolin clay,  which partners Charles Gladding,  Peter McGill McBean,  and George Chambers leased from the owner, George Towle,  in 1875 for the production of vitrified  sewer pipe. The dramatic growth of west coast cities in the latter part of the 19th century gave this product a bright future.

A two-story headquarters building was constructed in 1884, the year the company began production of architectural  ornament,  to advertise terra cotta’s advantages over other materials such as stone. It once stood at 1358 Market Street in San Francisco but is long gone.

Terra Cotta was less expensive to use for architectural purposes than stone for several reasons. It could be glazed  and textured to mimic different  kinds of the more costly material  from warm buff-colored sandstone to cool gray granite. And because terra cotta was lighter than stone the amount of structural steel needed for the building frame could be reduced, which also lower costs.

Architects  favored terra cotta because their designs could be modeled at full scale and reworked,  if necessary,  before they were cast. Despite the need for skilled labor to make the molds, once made, these could be reused more or less indefinitely. The standardization provided by the use of molds guaranteed accuracy in repeated ornament,  saved money through speedy execution,  and avoided the need for site work by expensive skilled labor.

To reduce costs further, it was common practice to construct tall buildings using stone on the ground floor and perhaps the second and third floors if they were visible from the street. But the upper floors were often clad in terra cotta or cast stone colored and textured to imitate the  stone used below.

“Shapes of Clay,” a company publication, described the process by which an architecct’s drawing was turned into reality.  In the factory drafting room, the drawing was keyed to show the location of the ornament. A shop drawing was then made following the architect’s  drawing and submitted to the architect for approval. Full size working drawings were made with allowance for shrinkage, and every piece was scheduled. At the factory, staff artists modeled the ornament in clay and plaster. After approval by the architect–often by means of photographs taken in the shop—the model was sent to the plaster shop where final molds were made. The publication recognized the creative efforts of the staff sculptors, adding that they were always under the supervision of the architect.

6 Responses

  1. Thank you for the comment; I have long admired the Plaza’s elephants!

  2. Jan Plymale Hodgson says:

    There are still some elements of the PPIE around the bay area.
    Our elephants guarding Plaza Vina del Mar garden in Sausalito (designed by McKim, Mead and White of NY),have the acanthus leaves on the podiums. Wm.Faville also used this relief in the fountain as well.

  3. Tom Lease says:

    Sounds cliche, but they don’t make em like they used to. Truly a lost art easily missed if you are not looking out for it. Wonderful representations in word and picture.

  4. Great articles! After reading all three installments I’m struck, yet again, by how radical a change modernism was/is from millennia of architectural tradition. The legibility of buildings, in the literal and symbolic sense, has been reduced to a subjective, abstract aesthetic response

  5. John Parman says:

    This is a great series! I miss ornament.

  6. John Lau says:

    Thoroughly enjoyed the posts and I now have an informed and therefore better appreciation of the art form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *