Lessons from Living in a House Designed by William Wurster
By Jay Claiborne
I was educated as an architect, but most of my best design lessons have been derived from daily life in the built environment. Perhaps the strongest influence on my aesthetic sense is having lived in a house designed by William Wurster for the last thirty-five years. My admiration for the design of the house grows almost on a daily basis as details of it continue to attract my attention. Here are a few examples:
Siting is one of the most important factors in residential design. Our house is located on a property in the Berkeley Hills that is blessed with a panoramic view of the Bay. But the view did not drive Wurster’s design. He sited the house so that the long elevation of what is essentially a two story, rectilinear box faces east, not west to the Bay view. This orientation gives all of the interior rooms exposure to a side garden and the morning sun. Selected spaces, the living room/dining room and master bedroom, have direct views to the Bay. After only a season of living in the house with two sons and dogs, we realized the brilliance of the siting.
We continue to be drawn outdoors for leisure time in the yard, the dramatic vistas, and the eastern exposure. The kitchen, living room/dining room and three upstairs bedrooms all have extra wide doors that open to the garden or to second floor balconies facing the garden. The long elevation has minimal exposure to the harsh winds and rains that blow from the Bay. On a sunny morning when we are sitting outside the kitchen at a table on the garden patio, we are reminded how shortsighted it would have been to let the house divide such a beautiful green place into a front yard facing the bay and a back yard facing, well, the back yard. The house is a primary lesson in what could be called, Architecture is About Buildings and their Context.
A roof is not just a cover to keep out the weather. It is a major component of the form of a building and one whose effect can be experienced even from the inside. Our house is documented as being Wurster’s first use of the shed roof for a residential building. In addition to simplifying the exterior form of the house while adding a bit of reference to a California farm building, the shed roof allows the interior rooms it covers to be more than little or mid-sized boxes. The floor to ceiling height of the ground level rooms is approximately nine feet, adding an even more generous sense of space to the open plan layout. The second floor rooms have a floor to ceiling height at the low side of the roof of approximately six-feet eight inches. The shed roof allows this height to increase to nine feet or more on the opposite side of the room.
The shed roof is another example of the functional simplicity of Wurster’s design aesthetic. It provides a very cost effective and simple roofing system. The framing does not require special bracing given the width of the house; the pitch allows easy drainage; and the finish material can be tar and gravel as on a flat roof. A shed roof can easily be built to overhang and shelter exterior doorways. Finally, it has proved much more enduring and alluring to live with over time than the double-pitched version, which requires higher maintenance. Thus the roof form is critical, both aesthetically and functionally.
From taking tours of other Wurster designed houses, I have observed that he typically made creative use of circulation elements such as stairs to create a dramatic effect in otherwise fairly ordinary plans. For the thirty-five years we have lived in our Wurster-designed house, I have never ceased to marvel at the beauty created by its simple curved staircase.
Midway between the first and second floor, a large, projecting window offers a view of distant trees and lights the space. Wurster approximately doubled the wall depth to accommodate this window. The design permitted simple construction and was relatively inexpensive for such a dramatic custom treatment. Furthermore, it enhanced the experience of going from one level to another.
The upper landing leads to each of the three bedrooms and features a solid bannister overlooking the stairs. The center point is a rounded element that also is finished to match the plastered walls. A light hangs over the top of the rounded center and a fixture was chosen that is a simple glazed cylinder. This stairway is the one dramatic element in an otherwise simple and plain house. The lesson is that stairways are an opportunity to add spice to the relationship between form and function.
Every time I look out of the windows in the house, I am stunned by what often appears to be an artful arrangement of what is on the outside. The single pane opening means that the outdoor space is virtually part of the indoor space. Although in a time of awareness of energy efficient design, a large, single paned window becomes more problematic–especially when they are made operable–windows and their detailing are of prime importance to the beauty and livability of a home or a workplace.
When you are seated inside our house and look out one of the ground floor windows, you can see the ground as well as the horizon and sky. Wurster designed the window openings on the ground floor to be at a height above the floor level of approximately 27 inches. The result is a strong visual connection between the outdoor and the indoor space. There is no sense of floating or of being in a tree. The design is one of being literally grounded, even in a setting of almost overwhelming long-range views. The ground plane is made part of the view. This detail reinforces all aspects of the connection between indoor and outdoor space.
Pages: 1 2


















9 Comments
By Caitlin Brostrom on Jan 13, 2012
Wonderful to read your thoughts about living in Wurster’s house, Jay. Thank you!
By Sally Woosdbridge on Jan 13, 2012
Thank you for the comment!
By Dan Gregory on Jan 16, 2012
Jay this is excellent and demonstrates Wurster’s remarkable ability to focus on ordinary but essential elements and make them memorable, like the stair and the stair window. You deftly explain some of Wurster’s key concepts, as in your felicitous phrases “functional simplicity” and how “the ground plane is made part of the view.” Bravo. I might want to steal some of this for my Eye On Design blog…
By Rob Steinberg on Jan 16, 2012
Jay- Very thoughtful. What strikes me is that both the designer and the resident are so in sync as to be able to communicate to one another, or others, over such a long and enduring relationship. What a nice goal for an architect to try to achieve. Hope all is well with the family.
Best, Rob
By Mac McGinnis on Jan 16, 2012
Very enjoyable, Sally. Certainly, it points up the aspect of time in appreciating architecture — and the personal insights of a sensitive observer add richness to the writing.
By Sally B. Woodbridge on Jan 16, 2012
Thank you, for commenting!
By Robin Chiang on Jan 22, 2012
Thank you for this thoughtful essay on what good architecture can achieve. I am reminded that Wurster practiced what the College of Environmental Design was meant to teach. The relevance of its original mission has not diminished.
By Kate on Jan 22, 2012
We are in the midst of renovating a Wurster home for sale,and it has been tricky to find the right balance between updating and staying true to the original plan for the house. The house has been our family home for over 50 years as I was the third generation to be able to enjoy the true beauty of the home. William Wurster really did an incredible job of blending the indoor and outdoor elements to come toghter seemlessly.I love this home and the clean beautiful lines of it.
By Carol Deering on Jan 23, 2012
I would say ditto for our house next door! I’m so glad you decided to build this house for your mother-in-law in 1981, on the flat portion of your lot, where Wurster had planned a tennis court. Because you were able to “see” and “live” the positive design aspects of your Wurster, you were successful in designing them into 68 Twain. We too are enjoying those Wurster elements that you write about – without the added maintenance of those extra 40 years! ~Thanks Jay